okay, bringing a little psychology into the collective today :) i recently wrote something about the “maps” we quietly carry into relationships: how early experiences can shape what closeness, distance, reassurance, uncertainty and even chemistry feel like to us later on. it started with attachment theory, but I was much more interested in the questions underneath it. why can uncertainty sometimes feel more intense than actual compatibility? why does calm affection feel natural to one person and strangely unfamiliar to another? and how much of what we feel in relationships belongs to the person in front of us, versus the expectations we arrived with? i also tried to stay away from the whole internet version of “he didn’t text back = avoidant attachment” lol. human beings are thankfully much more complicated than that. enjoy your reading 👀 “The Maps We Carry Into Relationships”
Like 3 comments
Photo of brreennt
brreennt
Crazy how relatable this is 🙌
Photo of austbaumer
austbaumer
1. Because uncertainty feels like a threat, it’s a biological response. 2. Calm affection can feel different to someone who grew up surrounded by intense emotions, like in abusive or overly intense relationships. 3. When you lose the pink glasses and start looking at someone’s actions rather than how everything appears, I think that’s when you realise whether you love the image you created or the actual person.
Add a comment
Abraham George is on Collective
The private community app for LGBTQ+ friends, networking, events and more.
See their full profile in the app
Sign Up
Join 150,000 members Download
Profile Picture
Abraham George is on Collective
Get the app to continue
Download