I just read this quotation from the American novelist Silas House: “Any two people can set and jaw* all day long, but it takes two people right for each other to set together and just be quiet.” —Silas House, in A Parchment of Leaves Note: House is approximating an Appalachian dialect, so “set” is how “sit” might be pronounced, and “jaw” means to “talk.” To paraphrase, a character in the novel says that any two people can sit around a chat all day, but only two people who are right for one another can sit together in silence. Do you agree or disagree? Why or why not?
Like 2 comments
Photo of reese
reese
I agree in part. I think we’ve developed this idea that remaining silent is a sign of emotional intelligence but being able to stimulate thought and conversation can further meaningful connection. Silence as avoidance m, insecurity or lacking depth is the other side of the same coin
Photo of casbahmike
casbahmike
Yes. I agree with that. I think Freud who first wrote about the utility of the therapist’s silence in encouraging the patient to make associations that could provide psychological insights, but I think that humans also have an aversion to silence when we’re with others, so we give voice to everything, even the most banal observations, and I’m not sure the associations we make to avoid silence are valuable, either. The ability to make “small talk” is an important social skill, but with those we know well, ideally we develop the capacity to understand when it might be good to get them to talk about something and when we can each be alone with our own thoughts.
Add a comment
Michael Toler is on Collective
The private community app for LGBTQ+ friends, networking, events and more.
See their full profile in the app
Sign Up
Join 140,000 members Download
Profile Picture
Michael Toler is on Collective
Get the app to continue
Download